[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKGDhHWt4GLVTjw=CRgzR4rvoFCAVrVAa9Q4cDRPpKnx7jYkYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 19:28:29 +0200
From: Agnieszka Bielec <bielecagnieszka8@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [GSoC] John the Ripper support for PHC finalists
2015-04-11 19:13 GMT+02:00 Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org>:
> On 04/11/2015 07:03 PM, Agnieszka Bielec wrote:
> On my system (Intel quad core i5-4570) I get 51648 c/s without SSE2 and
> 73216 c/s with SSE2.
>
> While the memset at the end of POMELO() is necessary to clear the
> memory, it is not necessary for us doing password "guessing" instead of
> hashing real user passwords.
>
> Just commenting out this memset in pomelo_plug.c and pomelo_sse2_plug.c
> helps a little bit: I get 52160 c/s without SSE2 and 74240 c/s with SSE2.
right, also there is malloc() in POMELO().
will it be faster if I move it to somewhere else?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
