[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55243A1B.6000307@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 22:12:11 +0200
From: ba <bielecagnieszka8@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [GSoC] John the Ripper support for PHC finalists
On 05.04.2015 12:14, Solar Designer wrote:
> Agnieszka,
>
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 04:31:28AM +0200, Agnieszka Bielec wrote:
>> [a@...er run]$ ./john --format=pomelo-opencl -dev=4 --test
>> Device 4: Intel(R) Many Integrated Core Acceleration Card
>> Build log: Compilation started
>> Compilation done
>> Linking started
>> Linking done
>> Build started
>> Kernel <pomelo_crypt_kernel> was successfully vectorized
>> Done.
>> Local worksize (LWS) 64, global worksize (GWS) 64
>> Benchmarking: pomelo-opencl, POMELO [POMELO OpenCL (inefficient,
>> development use only)]... DONE
>> Raw: 34.2 c/s real, 6400 c/s virtual
> BTW, I noticed that you're running a pomelo-opencl cracking job on
> -dev=4 now. (As well as another one on -dev=5.) This is fine.
> However, I used this opportunity to SSH in to the MIC card and see
> whether your use of it causes much load there. Not surprisingly, it
> does not. The load is almost non-existent:
it is a big probability that these processes are processes which
stopped responding and are waiting for something I can't specify.
I was experimenting with different values for auto tune
and clEnqueueNDRRangeKernel and sometimes
some processes were starting but weren't do anything
thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
