Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <552293FB.7080908@mailbox.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 16:11:07 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Mail threading (was: John the Ripper support for PHC finalists)

On 04/06/2015 02:40 PM, Agnieszka Bielec wrote:
> 2015-04-06 11:58 GMT+02:00 Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org
> <mailto:frank.dittrich@...lbox.org>>:
>>you replied to Solar Designer, but quoted one of my messages. Please
>>stop doing this.
> 
> Sorry I'm not sure what you mean.

You did it again. You replied to magnum's message, but started quoting
my message.

Some MUAs use the "In-Reply-To:"-header to display the incoming messages
as threads (i.e., group place them under the corresponding "parent"
message).

You can have a look at
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.openwall.john.devel/10936/focus=11124


The highlighted mail apparently is your reply to Solar's message (I
assume because you hit "reply" while being positioned on that message),
but you removed all contents of Solar's message and then copied&pasted
some other contend of a different mail (and probably manually added the
"> " to indicate quotation.)


I guess magnum will comment on your other points.

Frank

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.