Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55216DE8.8080203@mailbox.org>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2015 19:16:24 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: gpg and gpg-opencl benchmarks

Alexander,

On 04/05/2015 11:44 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> Frank, magnum -
> 
> The speeds reported by our gpg and gpg-opencl benchmarks look too high
> to me:
> 
> [solar@...er run]$ export GOMP_CPU_AFFINITY=0-31
> [solar@...er run]$ ./john -te -form=gpg-opencl -dev=1
> Will run 32 OpenMP threads
> Device 1: Tahiti [AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series]
> Local worksize (LWS) 64, global worksize (GWS) 262144
> Benchmarking: gpg-opencl, OpenPGP / GnuPG Secret Key [SHA1 OpenCL]... (32xOMP)DONE
> Speed for cost 1 (iteration count) of 65536, cost 2 (hash algorithm [1:MD5 2:SHA1 3:RIPEMD160 8:SHA256 9:SHA384 10:SHA512 11:SHA224]) of 2, cost 3 (cipher algorithm [1:IDEA 2:3DES 3:CAST5 4:Blowfish 7:AES128 8:AES192 9:AES256]) of 3
> Raw:    619237 c/s real, 46098 c/s virtual
> 
> 619237*65536/10^9 = 40.6 billion SHA-1/second
> 
> This is way too much for one GPU in a 7990.
> 
> Is this really "for cost 1 (iteration count) of 65536"?  And if it is,
> why is it so fast?
> 
> The --format=gpg exhibits the same problem, only with speeds lower
> according to the CPU/GPU performance difference.  (So it reports speeds
> that look too high for the CPUs.)

yes you are right, thanks for noticing.

I just took my_salt->count and reported it as iteration count.
But in gpg_fmt_plug.c we have

532:		n = cur_salt->count / bs;
533-		while (n-- > 0) {
534-			SHA1_Update(&ctx, keybuf, bs);
535-		}
536:		SHA1_Update(&ctx, keybuf, cur_salt->count % bs);
537-		SHA1_Final(key + (i * SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH), &ctx);

577:		n = cur_salt->count / bs;
578-		while (n-- > 0) {
579-			SHA256_Update(&ctx, keybuf, bs);
580-		}
581:		SHA256_Update(&ctx, keybuf, cur_salt->count % bs);
582-		SHA256_Final(key + (i * SHA256_DIGEST_LENGTH), &ctx);

etc.

This needs to be fixed. Right now I really am too tired.

Frank

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.