[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b2a12220212375da5d7d6eb9019eec8@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:32:20 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: New SIMD generations, code layout
On 2015-04-02 17:47, Lei Zhang wrote:
> I fixed the MIC intrinsics used in rawSHA256_ng and rawSHA512_ng. Now
> they can build and pass the self-tests.
So what speeds do you see on the MIC now, for these formats? Are we
hitting the bottleneck with single-thread candidate generation?
The real pay-off is when we get things like pbkdf2-hmac-sha* formats to
support AVX-512. They should scale with almost no overhead.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
