[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANWtx02wzdjNoX-FvHaA_s+txBRC=yn_0PcNKXjf2nZmeS0M7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:47:38 -0400
From: Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: qhasm-cudasm (was: Xeon Phi)
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> Thanks, although I would have appreciated you posting this to a separate
> thread as it has little to do with Xeon Phi.
Sorry about that, I know better.
> On the actual topic, I think you're confused. In
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-dev/2012/11/02/2 you had already
> corrected your own confusion -
>
> "My mistake, that was not qhasm-cudasm. Sorry."
>
> Our "Low-level GPU programming" idea says "the qhasm-cudasm tool is not
> released", and as far as I'm aware this is still correct.
It goes to show I'm still confused :)
-rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
