[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54FB4431.5070006@openwall.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 21:32:17 +0300
From: Alexander Cherepanov <ch3root@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Any advice on how to fuzz john jumbo by AFL
On 2015-03-07 19:22, Kai Zhao wrote:
>> How much exec/sec do you get with unmodified/modified john in afl? How
>> much total paths discovered?
>
> Both total execs and total paths are 41.
AFL shows "total execs : 41" in the "stage progress" part of its status
screen after 6 hours of work? That's definitely wrong.
"total paths : 41" is possible if you took one simple hash as input. In
case of john, afl cannot jump from a hash for one format to a hash for
another format because most formats have specific tags in their hashes.
You have to either take hashes for all formats or prepare a dictionary
of all tags (afl-fuzz -x).
> I modified john by comment the function john_run() in "src/john.c" in order
> to just fuzz the john_init() function which involves format valid.
That's nice.
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Alexander Cherepanov <ch3root@...nwall.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2015-03-07 16:22, Kai Zhao wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I fuzzed john jumbo two days but without find any crashes. The fuzz
>>> result indicates that john jumbo is robust or my fuzz test go somewhere
>>> wrong place.
Please don't include a full copy of the email you are replying to unless
it's necessary for some reason.
--
Alexander Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
