[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+TsHUB0Ztdm78_FoZ2gS+pOiPZFy9=sAV90CYyoEkSdPxcUcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:55:13 +0530
From: Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com>
To: john-dev <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: descrypt speed
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Royce Williams <royce@...ho.org> wrote:
> Many salts up slightly (but within normal variation?), and one-salt
> performance is down ~18% from previous - but still much better than
> before this work. :-)
>
That's strange. Commit 65fd39cee8 does nothing to affect performance. I
think the second run is more accurate. It is closer to the c/s rate you
were getting with the 10 minutes cracking session with single salt. Maybe
the baseline was somewhat inflated.
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
