|
Message-ID: <20150109161609.GA16881@openwall.com> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 19:16:09 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: PRINCE On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 05:02:02PM +0100, magnum wrote: > Cool. I already created an issue for it in > https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/1011 Great! > I saw a couple of bugfixes a day so far, so it's not completely stable. > We should try to keep it "mergable" in one way or the other. At least > refrain from large rewrites unless necessary. For example, we should > #ifdef out unneeded code blocks instead of dropping them. Right, or alternatively we reimplement and then maintain our own code, and submit it back to hashcat project. Maybe later. ;-) I think the dependency on GMP could/should be avoided, e.g. in favor of "double" (like our charset.c uses it) or in favor of saturation at 2^64-1. > > So, anyone wants to integrate this code into -jumbo as a new cracking > > mode (which it is)? > > Unless someone else (read Jim :) beats me to it, I will. Thanks! > On a side note I haven't looked at the code at all yet but I'm curious > about this mode vs. GPU generation. Perhaps the hotter parts can reside > on GPU? That would be awsome. If it's worthwhile at all I'm sure Atom > will implement it soon. I think this is do-able and reasonable. > > There's a dependency on GMP, so (as currently implemented) this mode > > should only be included if GMP is found by the configure tests (we > > already have a test for it, for SRP). > > Yes, we'll have autoconf take care of that. The SRP formats can > optionally do without GMP with some speed penalty, perhaps we can > implement that later. I wouldn't even expect any speed penalty for PRINCE if we move it off GMP - I'd expect slight speedup or no measurable change. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.