Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+TsHUA-uFgVNrsA9c9Z1Wfn-_Of5EYdhQjOyxsaz9ivbJkpJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:44:01 +0530
From: Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com>
To: john-dev <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Jumbo 1 release

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:26 PM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
>
> I say go for it! Perhaps consider cherry-picking first or both of
> Sayantan's patches that are in the descrypt-test-amd branch though (as
> mentioned in the descrypt issue now)



I was planning to create two separate paths(compile-time) for those two
patches but it would require some testing regarding which device should
follow which path. Since we don't have time, patch1 have 0 goto statements,
hence more reliable but performance is somewhat poor. If you agree, I'll
push a polished version of patch1 to bleeding-jumbo.

Content of type "text/html" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.