|
Message-ID: <7cb97367ed8bb4def7cad9b40f4c888e@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 23:58:53 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: proof of concept converter of rexgen-like syntax into john rules On 2014-04-15 21:26, Rich Rumble wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:11 PM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: > >> One side effect when working with this is it makes me want a sed2rules >> generator too, perhaps even in combination with rexgen ;-) This would >> finally solve the "complex leet permutations" problem (like "replace any of >> [aA] with any of [aA4@] *and* any of [eE] with any of [eE3] *and* any of >> ..."). >> > Just a quick note, I have great success with "1337" rules that don't > replace ALL instances... But I get what you were saying :) > http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-users/2010/08/03/4 I bet that's very common. Doing what I describe above, we will create all combinations of "only some instances" as well as "all instances". But it would result in a large number of rules I guess. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.