[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e0e1c3f950df2bc7d2ded650d182ef41@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:07:31 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: SAP-B obscure bug or intended behavior?
On 2014-02-20 23:17, magnum wrote:
> I'm passing it on to john-dev to start with. Anyone got a clue? I know
> we tested this format with a whole lot of real SAP hashes. I'll dig out
> older versions of our format and check if it behaves differently.
It doesn't. The very first SAP B contribution from
http://marc.info/?l=john-users&m=121444075820309 cracks the supplied
test vector so if it's a bug, it's bug-compatible with that version...
The question is, like Atom says, how an actual SAP system will parse it.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
