[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP139F8CEFD1237EF4FCFBF9EFDCB0@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 10:22:23 +0100
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Oracle11 vs. lotus85 (was: Commit 66557876 (in May) broke raw-sha384,
raw-sha512 and raw-sha512-ng-i)
On 01/02/2014 05:47 AM, magnum wrote:
> On 2014-01-01 19:39, magnum wrote:
>> On 2013-12-31 02:32, Frank Dittrich wrote:
>>> I reported the error in August (without bisecting it at that time), but
>>> nobody cared:
>>> http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-dev/2013/08/01/8
>>> http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-dev/2013/08/02/4
>>
>> Was the SAP issue fixed since then? I now get 0 cracked for Oracle11 but
>> no problem with SAP.
>
> The Oracle11 problem was just because TS need to supply
> --format=oracle11 after lotus85 was added. Fixed in TS.
Funny.
(bleeding-jumbo)run $ ./john ../test/oracle11_tst.in --format=lotus85 |tail
Press 'q' or Ctrl-C to abort, almost any other key for status
1500g 0:00:00:00 DONE (2014-01-02 10:17) 2205g/s 13239p/s 17647c/s
17647C/s u1499-oracle111..u0-oracle11u0
Use the "--show" option to display all of the cracked passwords reliably
Session completed
u1498-oracle11 (u9-oracle11)
u1498-oracle11 (u8-oracle11)
u1498-oracle11 (u7-oracle11)
u1498-oracle11 (u6-oracle11)
u1498-oracle11 (u5-oracle11)
u1498-oracle11 (u4-oracle11)
u1498-oracle11 (u3-oracle11)
u1498-oracle11 (u2-oracle11)
u1498-oracle11 (u1-oracle11)
u1498-oracle11 (u0-oracle11)
Are oracle11 and lotus85 essentially the same formats?
I didn't look at the source so far. I just was surprized that
--format=lotus85 cracks the Oracle11 hashes.
(bleeding-jumbo)run $ ./john --test --format=lotus85
Benchmarking: lotus85, Lotus Notes/Domino 8.5 [8/32]... DONE
Raw: 117434K c/s real, 117434K c/s virtual
(bleeding-jumbo)run $ ./john --test --format=oracle11
Benchmarking: oracle11, Oracle 11g [SHA1 128/128 SSE2 8x]... DONE
Many salts: 2645K c/s real, 2645K c/s virtual
Only one salt: 2122K c/s real, 2122K c/s virtual
At least for linux-x86-native, lotus85 seems to be faster;)
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
