[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+EaD-bd2DzBdMgAuN_o-L+Cp1HKkHr39DG9KP7byDZ3nY6-ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:33:04 +0100
From: Katja Malvoni <kmalvoni@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: bcrypt-parallella on 64-core (was: Katja's weekly
report #13)
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Katja Malvoni <kmalvoni@...il.com> wrote:
> With the same code, performance on E16 system is 1194 c/s because I'm
> transferring whole inputs structure no matter whether keys or salt changed.
>
If I transfer keys only when changed, performance on E16 is 1207 c/s and on
E64 it's 4812 c/s.
And code seems to be reliable. I left "while :; do rm -f john.log john.pot;
seq 0 49999 | sudo -E LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH ./john -stdin
-form=bcrypt-parallella ~/pw-bcrypt-2salt-50k 2>&1 > /dev/null | fgrep
0:00; done" running for half an hour, it cracked all hashes on both E16 and
E64 system.
Katja
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
