[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60e48bd566974e557bed47c8a97f0c24@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 03:17:02 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Mask mode resume/progress/node support
On 24 sep 2013, at 02:26, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
> The fork/node support is as suboptimal as it gets, I'm not sure what to do about it. For GPU generation it's not a big deal I guess.
BTW I can't see why you seem to use a GWS of 4M or more, and a mask of just 26^2. If you really want that total KPC, why not use eg. a GWS of ~160K and a mask of 26^3? That would reduce key transfer with 96% and mitigate the fork/node problem as well. Or am I missing something?
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
