|
Message-ID: <44590d03f85e04a4bec3985f54adadfe@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 01:23:28 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Daniel's reports #13, #14 On 23 sep 2013, at 00:38, Dániel Bali <balijanosdaniel@...il.com> wrote: > 2013/9/21 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> >> After a couple of minutes of staring at your code^Whack, I think I see >> the bug: you set BINARY_SIZE to 2, whereas it should be 4 (or even 8, if >> you're for some totally weird reason experimenting with 64-bit hash >> values for now, even though CRC-32 will only use 32-bit). > > BINARY_SIZE started out as 4, when I was testing and didn't modify everything from the keccak format. > But I believe in the end the BINARY_SIZE should be 1, because a CRC32 is 32-bit. > For example raw-md5-opencl has: > > #define CIPHERTEXT_LENGTH 32 > #define DIGEST_SIZE 16 > #define BINARY_SIZE 4 Yes but raw-md5 use reduced binary and then checks the rest in cmp_exact(). The real binary size in raw-md5 is 16. The binary size have to use for CRC32 is 4, for 32 bits. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.