[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+EaD-aUANGdiCV-Xo99aptaVmd1hdzwj2BRvOx3fRQ9S+vrnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 23:04:07 +0200
From: Katja Malvoni <kmalvoni@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: ZedBoard / Parallella: bcrypt
Hello,
With true dual port BRAM used to store Sbox, performance is 25.6 c/s with
100 MHz clock.
With 150 MHz clock, performance is 50.4 c/s but some timing constraints
aren't met and parallella-bcrypt format doesn't work. However, I tried
connecting bcrypt IP to 200 MHz clock and performance is again 50.4 c/s and
timing constraints aren't met. This time parallella-bcrypt format works. My
guess is that tool did clock conversion to known working value or something
like this because otherwise performance numbers don't make sense.
This is performance with 2 cycle latency inferred block RAM. My next step
is to use 1 cycle latency BRAM (non-registered outputs) and do more
optimizations.
Katja
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
