[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130915200255.GA21417@openwall.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:02:55 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: ZedBoard / Parallella: bcrypt
Katja,
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 08:33:45PM +0200, Katja Malvoni wrote:
> At one moment I hard coded cost to be 5 and I forgot about it so it works
> only for cost 5 hashes. I'm testing it with cost 12 and I'm getting cracks
> so it works now.
Oh, this must be why my test had failed - I was using $2a$04 hashes
there. I should have noticed that the c/s rate reported on the status
line matched the self-test's (it did), which means it was for $2a$05.
> At the moment it's on around 390000 clock cycles with dual port ram
> (simulation works, not tested on Zedboard).
390000 clock cycles for $2a$05? This feels too fast. Maybe you meant
3900000 (twice faster than you had before)?
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
