|
Message-ID: <CABob6iq6ALm=+4a=kw0PVO-Ve5_=8wBFicW-LfTTy2NpRJrStQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 03:00:58 +0200 From: Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Daniel's weekly report #9 2013/8/16 Dániel Bali <balijanosdaniel@...il.com>: > I tried to patch the binary with the microcode (generated by > KernelAnalyzer) of the following opencl code: > > __kernel void blowfish(constant uint *buf1, constant uint *buf2, __global > uint *buf3, __global uint *buf4, __global uint *buf5, uint rounds, constant > uint *buf6) { > buf3[0] = 111; > buf4[0] = 222; > buf5[0] = 333; > } Can you post this isa code? I am affraid you're still missing the point of this test. If using bf kernel to test ds instructions is hard, maybe it will be faster/easier to write simple opencl code that will utilize ds instructions itself, and will be easier to modify. Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.