|
|
Message-ID: <CABob6iq6ALm=+4a=kw0PVO-Ve5_=8wBFicW-LfTTy2NpRJrStQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 03:00:58 +0200
From: Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: Daniel's weekly report #9
2013/8/16 Dániel Bali <balijanosdaniel@...il.com>:
> I tried to patch the binary with the microcode (generated by
> KernelAnalyzer) of the following opencl code:
>
> __kernel void blowfish(constant uint *buf1, constant uint *buf2, __global
> uint *buf3, __global uint *buf4, __global uint *buf5, uint rounds, constant
> uint *buf6) {
> buf3[0] = 111;
> buf4[0] = 222;
> buf5[0] = 333;
> }
Can you post this isa code?
I am affraid you're still missing the point of this test. If using bf
kernel to test ds instructions is hard, maybe it will be faster/easier
to write simple opencl code that will utilize ds instructions itself,
and will be easier to modify.
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.