[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP381A10F2FE7A55D5CD7AAAAFD440@phx.gbl>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 00:02:19 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Bleeding-jumbo release
On 08/11/2013 04:53 PM, magnum wrote:
> On 8 Aug, 2013, at 23:13 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
>> I still hope to release bleeding as 1.8.0-jumbo-1 in not too distant future
>
> Here's the status as of 0d3eaa1:
>
> The problematic patches from Sayantan now only exist in the bleeding-mask branch.
>
> All Bleeding-jumbo issues known to me are listed in https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues
I don't see the problem I mentioned on john-users a few days ago:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.openwall.john.user/6720/
benchmark-unify needs some adjustments so that relbench finds more
matches between current unstable (or latest jumbo release) and current
bleeding.
When do you need those changes? I hope I'll be able to do something
within the next 7 days. Not sure how much that will help.
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
