[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+TsHUC1bCjJU0Ct5-9d1PimrtutmWy1j13DFi4tjvr7a6C1fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 20:55:57 +0530
From: Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Busted OpenCL formats
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:42 PM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure why this happens in bleeding though - the mask mode is not
> committed yet so how can index ever be > loaded_count?
I think during status checks, the call to get_key has index = 0 and
max_keys_per_crypt. While it is easy to detect index = max_keys_per_crypt ,
but for 0 it gets confused whether 0 is for cracked password or just for a
status check. It is possible to detect 0 for status check based on the fact
that if nothing is cracked it must be the status check.
But if something gets cracked and simultaneously we press status check it
will get confused.
Regards,
Sayantan
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
