[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABob6ip-KRSWkT04CPrbT0RZpuCf5wxTsqV0oe5smbtoVKa3UA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:20:22 +0200
From: Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Sayantan's Weekly Report #7
2013/8/7 Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com>:
> Loading large number of hashes means that it takes more time to check those
> hashes rather than generating them. I have few plans such as using local
> memory to store as many hashes as possible, should easily store 2048 hashes
> or even more depending on how many bytes per hash is being stored. Then
> cache them on the fly if more hashes are loaded than what could be stored in
> local memory. Or use the global memory entirely because caching will have
> some overhead too.
Have you tried looking at Multiforcer sources as solar suggested earlier?
I do not have time to read through, but you could save some time by doing it
first before trying to achieve similar results.
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
