[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130730162947.GA18865@openwall.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:29:47 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Daniel's weekly report #7
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 05:49:07PM +0200, Lukas Odzioba wrote:
> 2013/7/30 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>:
> > No. Please take a look at e.g. x86.S (note the uppercase "S", which
> > means that cpp is enabled) to see how we use cpp macros when programming
> > in assembly. I think we'll approach GCN ISA asm in a similar fashion.
>
> Do you mean stopping compilation after preprocessing phase and then
> redirecting output to gcnasm?
Yes, but this does not involve "stopping" anything - rather, we can
merely invoke cpp followed by gcnasm. As an alternative, gcnasm itself
can be taught to recognize the uppercase "S" suffix and pass its input
through cpp in that case.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
