[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130727152007.GD27483@openwall.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 19:20:07 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: phpass-opencl experiments
Lukas -
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:13:43AM +0200, Lukas Odzioba wrote:
> Just to let you know.
> I played for a while with phpass-opencl code here are my remarks.
Thanks!
> After I changed KPC to 2048*1024
So we need auto-tuning.
> After applying attached patch:
So we need to commit it.
> Speed of my old code with hash comparision on gpu side with hash
> "embedded" in salt, is 2125K on amd (nv - not tested).
Why didn't you commit this? Is it because it wouldn't handle multiple
hashes sharing a salt value (this is how I read your description above)?
> I'll try to implement those changes after cmiyc,
Shouldn't we at least get your attached patch in before CMIYC?
> now I want to play with md5crypt, because we could gain more there.
Right.
Thanks again,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
