[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABob6irYEDUVjEdEm5K7jtM7t21d4mxC4t-YqjVMU2NMrNnnwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 04:04:26 +0200
From: Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256
2013/7/24 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>:
> Oh, I guess this speed difference has nothing to do with 7990 vs. 7970,
> but is about Catalyst version and clock rate differences (which we're
> tuning on the 7990 to prevent its GPU 0 from overheating - so you'd get
> different speeds on GPU 0 vs. GPU 1). You need to check the current
> clock rates before considering the performance numbers you obtain.
Sure you're right. Posting 7990 results was unecessary in this case.
BTW not surprisingly PBKDF2-SHA512 results are much slower:
6950: 2460 c/s
Titan: 2269 c/s
More details on that later.
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
