Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130723234120.GA4542@openwall.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:41:20 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: cryptocurrency mining fallback in JtR

Rafael,

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:23:39AM +0200, magnum wrote:
> On 23 Jul, 2013, at 5:57 , Rafael Waldo Delgado Doblas <lord.rafa@...il.com> wrote:
> > > OK, although it could be cleaner to turn this into an extra Makefile
> > > (then invoke with "make -f Makefile.miner TARGET=...") or extra targets
> > > inside the main Makefile (then invoke it with "make TARGET=...") or even
> > > have cgminer and dtach built by default after a normal build, without
> > > any unusual syntax on make's command line (this is what we discussed on
> > > IRC originally).  Do you find the latter hard to implement?
> > 
> > Acturally yes, the first thing that I tried to do was add to the Makefile
> > 
> > ../run/cgminer: ../run/john
> >         cd cgminer; ./configure; make;.....
> > 
> > But the configure scrypt didn't work. Maybe there are a problem with the make env variables.
> 
> In what way did it not work? Do you need some of the make environment variables passed to the configure script?

I second magnum's questions above.  "Didn't work" is generally not
sufficient info for a discussion - please provide some detail.

Thanks,

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.