[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0398a162bb29d44edf2274dc2188d38c@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 22:34:34 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Probably a third BUG in pbkdf2_hmac_sha1_unsplit_kernel.cl
On 12 Jul, 2013, at 19:31 , marcus.desto <marcus.desto@...pl> wrote:
> looks like there is one more bug:
>
> If #define SALTLEN 51 for SALTLEN is set to other value NOT 51 in pbkdf2_hmac_sha1_unsplit_kernel.cl, then
> resulting hashes are zero (16 or 20 - depends on parameters - zeros).
>
> Someone may varify it using c/c++.
Are you sure you got all defines right now? We have lots of formats working fine with a salt length much less than 51. Please post an example python file that demonstrates the problem as simply as possible.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
