[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+EaD-bQGVKZePaN+i-087_mMOfcuGOfxKAaknBjtdVMvKZY5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:22:37 +0200
From: Katja Malvoni <kmalvoni@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Parallella: bcrypt
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:54:31PM +0200, Katja Malvoni wrote:
> >[...]
>
> > Execution time when using all 16 cores is 294.676000 ms
>
> Why is it this much higher than for 1 core? Is most time spent on data
> transfers?
>
It's that high because call to e_load_group() is included into that time.
And that is why is so slow... I was measuring loading whole program onto
core and executing it instead of measuring only call to BF_crypt :(
I'm sorry, I'll check how much does it take to execute BF_crypt only.
Katja
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
