[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAepdCaThnwmqRCar-qgeG=rt7a9WDzGZemrOZTX85pUA35urA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 01:33:43 +0100
From: Rafael Waldo Delgado Doblas <lord.rafa@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Parallella: scrypt
It's true, but maybe in the Parallella's case is better use Pooler's
Cpuminer* because it has ARM support and ckolivas/cgminer doesn't look like
is going to improve the support any longer**. Also using Pooler's Cpuminer
is suppose to mine ~2khash/s in ARM Cortex-A9 DualCore 1.2GHz***.
BTW Pooler's Scrypt ARM implementation is a perfectly uncommented ARM-ASM
code :-). There another Pooler's ASM versions for x86 and x64.
What do you think?
*https://github.com/pooler/cpuminer
**https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=148826.0
***
https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/wiki/Mining-hardware-comparison
2013/6/27 Jeremi Gosney <epixoip@...dshell.nl>
> On 6/26/2013 2:49 PM, Rafael Waldo Delgado Doblas wrote:
> > I have checked the miner that epixoip told you, cgminer, but looks
> > like doesn't have CPU support, for CPU support there another one
> > called "cpuminer".
>
>
> Ah, it looks like cgminer dropped cpu mining a few months ago. Just go
> back to an earlier branch where it was still supported:
> https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer/tree/2.10
>
> By the way, cpuminer *is* cgminer. cpuminer was the old name, then when
> gpu support was added, it was renamed to cpu-gpu miner -- or cgminer,
> for short.
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
