Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP2884BF12C6164F03531E7D9FD9E0@phx.gbl>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 21:08:43 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: 1.8 jumbo1 (steps needed)

On 06/04/2013 07:52 PM, magnum wrote:
> On 4 Jun, 2013, at 14:27 , "jfoug" <jfoug@....net> wrote:
>> Are we going to target pushing unstable out first?  If so, what needs to be done, beyond rebasing it on the 1.8?
> 
> Unstable is to be released as 1.7.9-jumbo-8 (mostly for reference, it could be a pretty silent release) - or not released at all. It will definitely not be rebased. IMO we can release it as-is now (I'd just update CHANGES-jumbo.git with the last few changes). Personally I'm done testing it but I'll try to help with any issues found.

As stated earlier, I am all for releasing unstable as 1.7.9-jumbo-8 ASAP
and with as little additional work as possible.
Even if it is just for reverence what the unstable git tree conteined
while core was still at 1.7.9.

Frank

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.