[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A67C2F.8070601@mccme.ru>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 02:07:43 +0400
From: Alexander Cherepanov <cherepan@...me.ru>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: 333 (half-badass number?)
On 2013-05-18 23:55, magnum wrote:
> I see we now have 333 formats in bleeding-jumbo.
Do we really need it?
> That is *without* building CUDA or OpenCL. It was well under 300 some days ago unless I'm mistaken. Pretty amazing. I have some faint memory of being impressed with 100 formats not more than two (I think) years ago.
>
> Good job everyone, and especially Dhiru and Jim. Dhiru writes a format a day or so, and Jim's Dynamic now has 168 subformats!
Don't so many dynamics unnecessary slows --test and skew relbench results?
I mean it's great that we have so many formats but should all of them be
enabled by default?
--
Alexander Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
