[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a42d3870f3bf97faf716a40df88e1adb@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 09:21:18 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Unify internal form of mscash2 hashes?
On 27 May, 2013, at 7:05 , Alexander Cherepanov <cherepan@...me.ru> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> $ grep abrendelsoprano frank-final.pot
> $DCC2$10240#abrendel#000f2b7fbbf89e9d41c05e9fd32a0003:abrendelsoprano
> $DCC2$abrendel#000f2b7fbbf89e9d41c05e9fd32a0003:abrendelsoprano
>
> I suppose that msacash2 hashes are written to .pot differently by cpu and gpu formats (although I didn't check it). Shouldn't this be unified?
>
> --
> Alexander Cherepanov
It sure should. The GPU format should write a (default) iteration count if none were specified in the input hash.
Sayantan, will you have a look at this please? I think you merely need to take prepare() as-is from the CPU format. You can get rid of some whitespace noise while at it ;-)
The CUDA format is OK.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
