Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130527124548.7U2YV.160398.imail@eastrmwml214>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 12:45:48 -0400
From:  <jfoug@....net>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Initial work on cryptsha256 - SSE

I have checked this into bleeding, along with changes to sse-intrinsics.

It works pretty good in non-OMP mode.  It is failing in OMP, and I will have to track down why.

Jim.

---- jfoug@....net wrote: 
> 
> ---- jfoug@....net wrote: 
> > Not getting great improvement.  Some, but not as much as I know I can get.  
> 
> Built on bull, and things look  a little better.  
> 
> oSSL speed 350
> SSE2 speed 1080
> 
> SSE4 fails, but I will likely be switching from flat mode, to mixed mode.
> 
> Just fixed GATHER, and I get 1580/s on SSE4 build on bull, with the existing 'flat' input buffers.  Not too bad.  The old GATHER was not working (only used right now in raw-sha256-ng-i if MMX_LOAD is not defined).  I fixed GATHER, and created GATHER_x2 for the double width buffers I am using in sha256crypt.
> 
> Jim.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.