[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130526220702.GA24949@openwall.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 02:07:02 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: AMD GCN ISA development
Lukas, Sayantan, Daniel -
Can one/two/all of you please respond to Ronak below, and to further
questions/comments he might have? I don't have time now, but I dislike
leaving postings without a response.
Thanks,
Alexander
P.S. I am top-posting because I do not actually reply to Ronak, but
rather I quote his entire messages for others to reply to it. For
actual replies, I prefer inline quoting. So please do not take this
instance of top-posting as an example that it's the right thing to do -
usually it is not, in my opinion. ;-) (But there are exceptions.)
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:02:56PM +0530, Ronak wrote:
> Hi,
> While trying to align .isa in the inner elf of .elf, I had this thought,
> how kernel is going to run, if we decide to update .il and .isa
> simultaneously, such that each update will be different. With this, we have
> inconsistent kernel. Now two questions need to be asked..
> ** which update will actually run
> ** Updating both files, will it add to the flexibility of optimizing
> opencl kernels.
>
>
> Regards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
