[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+TsHUCk=t=W5DFJzWtv7Jdx7g6qCMKTgzKMQt5KSATUHhcjSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 11:50:41 +0530
From: Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: cmp_all on gpu for descrypt-opencl
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com> wrote:
> Focusing on the main loop it seems like we should return
> keys_count(updated keys count if generating passwords) on finding a match
> else we should return 0, right ? Also I didn't understand the bitmap stuff
> above.
> I saw loader.h for bitmap but it is still not clear.
>
I think the salt is always null during benchmark, why ? As a result I can't
get the loaded hashes from loader directly. This is not the main problem as
I can get the binaries to be loaded directly from test[] But during
benchmark returning anything other than *count gives FAILED(crypt all).
Also cmp_all() is called whether or not we are doing it inside the
crypt_all(). How do we bench the cmp_all integrated with crypt_all() ?
Regards,
Sayantan
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
