|
Message-ID: <d0811d93c76295300a4d826877f94ddd@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 15:05:35 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Enhancements to pbkdf2-sha256 On 7 May, 2013, at 9:35 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:10:39AM +0200, magnum wrote: >> We currently benchmark a mix of test vectors :-/ > > We only use first two salts for benchmarking, which currently (in > aix_ssha_fmt.c in bleeding) correspond to {ssha1}06. That's just 128 > SHA-1's, right? I am surprised the speed is not higher. I guess the figures are from some kind of suboptimal (MSVC?) 32-bit build so only the relative figures are interesting. My unmodified aix-ssha does 12990 c/s versus Jim's original figure of 4629. Optimistically hoping for same relative boost, I'd get 207543K c/s with SSE2 which would translate to over 27M SHA1/s. That's better that Tavis' raw-sha1 (like it should). magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.