|
Message-ID: <e8cad4f82230cf3eccb7006ff99a1939@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 08:53:02 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Enhancements to pbkdf2-sha256 On 7 May, 2013, at 7:45 , jfoug@....net wrote: > ---- jfoug <jfoug@....net> wrote: >> $ ../run/john -test=5 -form=aix-ssha >> Benchmarking: aix-ssha, AIX LPA PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA-1 / SHA-2 [32/32]... DONE >> Raw: 4629 c/s real, 4733 c/s virtual >> >> $ ../run/john -test=5 -form=aix-ssha >> Benchmarking: aix-ssha, AIX LPA PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA-1 / SHA-2 [32/32]... DONE >> Raw: 23831 c/s real, 24317 c/s virtual >> >> That is a 5x improvement, by simply not using the 'official/correct' >> PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC() function. > > Here is an SSE2 build: > > $ ../run/john -test=5 -form=aix-ssha > Benchmarking: aix-ssha, AIX LPA PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA-1 / SHA-2 [32/32]... DONE > Raw: 74061 c/s real, 74737 c/s virtual WAT!?, so you went from 4K to 24K without even starting to use SSE2? Wow. If you're not done with SSE2 SHA-512 in time for 1.8-Jumbo-1 we should simply wait until it's ready. We can release 1.7.9-Jumbo-8 in the meantime :-) magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.