[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130504172908.NF2T7.204202.imail@eastrmwml213>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 17:29:07 -0400
From: <jfoug@....net>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: SSE - PARA
We may want to audit our SSE-PARA values. I just checked a few on my 64 bit VM, building with icc, and both 32 and 64 bit were non-optimal.
Current icc: SHA1_SSE_PARA set to 2 for both 32 and 64 bit.
Timing using dyna_26
para-2 64 bit, 12.5k 32 bit 10.2k
para-1 64 bit, 13.5k 32 bit 12.8k
I have not looked much deeper. I am working on some SSE porting, and was simply doing some testing at different sse-para settings. Right now, I have bugs to work through, if PARA is > 1 for my pbkdf2-hmac-sha1 logic, but will get that fixed up 'soon'. I just wanted to report these findings while it was fresh in my memory.
Jim.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
