Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4539803dfbe14952d0fd67f6c480ba0e@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:21:01 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: --fork

On 30 Apr, 2013, at 18:24 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 05:40:02PM +0200, magnum wrote:
>> On 30 Apr, 2013, at 17:26 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
>>> BTW, we should only mute messages that we're almost certain will be the
>>> same for all processes.  In jumbo, you're also muting e.g. the
>>> "Invalid rule ..." message in rules.c, which I think is wrong, because
>>> this error might not be seen by the main process (MPI root node).  There
>>> might be more instances of this problem.
>> 
>> Yes, I'll revise that when at it. Actually I think I'll just drop most old such stuff before merging (a lot less clashes then). And afterwards I can re-add some as needed.
> 
> Sounds great.
> 
> Meanwhile, I've pushed out many more enhancements to --fork, including
> for its interaction with OpenMP.  Please test and merge.

Done. I'm testing Jumbo only, except when I find problems I verify that they do not exist in core. Right now I know of nothing specific but there's a LOT to test.

magnum

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.