[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9226d816ba943f81af3b8338b6282bb9@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 20:29:12 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [patch] sse/xop implementation of raw-sha256
On 9 Apr, 2013, at 19:00 , Jeremi Gosney <epixoip@...dshell.nl> wrote:
> I was surprised to learn there was no SIMD implementation of SHA2 in
> JTR, so I wrote one. I've completed SHA256, and have attached a patch
> for it. I will begin work on SHA512 shortly.
Cool, thanks! Committed now.
> I implemented this as a separate plugin from rawSHA256_fmt_plug.c and
> sse-intrinsics.c to aid in development and testing. I presume that if
> you accept this patch you will want to roll this into the existing
> files, and probably standardize some of the variable/macro names as well.
Yes, we should probably add it to sse-intrinsics.c, and use it from eg. pbkdf2_hmac_sha256.h and others, when applicable.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
