[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130321015154.GA11137@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 05:51:54 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Building unstable jumbo failed
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:32:06AM +0100, magnum wrote:
> To ease on the requirement for g++, we could drop gpg2john from the general targets so you'd have to "make gpg2john" to build it separately. That is how we treat things that require pcap, I think (if not, I guess we should).
> Or perhaps even try to build all of those automatically, but only after finishing John. That way if you lack g++, gpg2john would fail but you'd end up having John.
Yes, I think we should list the target binaries in order of increasing
number of prerequisites.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
