[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dbc03d0dcb08537bc860ab6122911da3@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 07:57:26 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: formats that duplicate dynamics
On 27 Jan, 2013, at 3:35 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> However, there's a more general issue: can't the same be implemented as
> a dynamic format? In fact, doesn't one of the predefined dynamic formats
> support these same hashes already? Maybe we should just document what
> predefined dynamic format should be used, and make this prominent in its
> FORMAT_NAME (so that it'll be seen on --test runs)?
As long as dynamic doesn't support OMP I think we should keep the separate formats. OTOH we could make them link to dynamic unless _OPENMP. Only Jim "knows" how to make thin formats but a look at eg. PHPS_fmt_plug.c should give the needed hints.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
