[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00ea01ce18d2$066e8c30$134ba490$@net>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 06:15:56 -0600
From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: bug report
I use backtrac 5r3 both 64 and 32 using VirtualBox (almost the same as
VMware).
*** Be sure that Ivan has performed: apt-get update & apt-get upgrade
I just checked, and my openssl version is 0.9.8k on 32 bit (my 64 bit VM is
on another machine I cannot access right now)
One thing to keep in mind, the build using: make linux-x86-sse2i is faster
than linux-x86-sse2.
I just checked builds from a fresh pull of unstable, using both the
linux-x86-sse2i and linux-x86-sse2 targets, and all 197 formats tested just
fine
Jim.
>From: Lukas Odzioba [mailto:lukas.odzioba@...il.com]
>
>2013/3/3 magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>:
>> My 32-bit OSX builds with native OpenSSL are "90812f" whatever that means
(0.9.8r?). Can't reproduce it here.
>>
>> I know Jim used backtrack 32-bit and 64-bit when he wrote the SSE support
for wpapsk. The 32-bit was likely the same backtrack version as OP used. He
had no problems!
>
>Ivan used vmware maybe that is related to problem somehow...
>I wasn't able to help him on irc with this so I asked to send this to
john-dev.
>
>Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
