[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad71159d091bd6612226b5681af1008b@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:24:02 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: mschapv2-bitsliced conversion
Excellent, I will test this and apply it.
magnum
On 15 Feb, 2013, at 10:38 , deepika dutta <deepikadutta_19@...oo.com> wrote:
> I didn't use mschapv2-naive while testing previously, but its done now and working fine on my 32 bit machine. I am attaching the patch which is based on unstable-jumbo and contains the mmx code and P definition changes. Please test for other platforms.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Deepika
> From: deepika dutta <deepikadutta_19@...oo.com>
> To: "john-dev@...ts.openwall.com" <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>; deepika dutta <deepikadutta_19@...oo.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 2:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [john-dev] mschapv2-bitsliced conversion
>
> Hi, I am sorry but there seems to be some problem in this patch, I will check and re-post.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Deepika
> From: deepika dutta <deepikadutta_19@...oo.com>
> To: "john-dev@...ts.openwall.com" <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 2:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [john-dev] mschapv2-bitsliced conversion
>
> I am attaching the patch based on unstable-jumbo. It contains the mmx code and also the changes related to P definition. It is working fine (for openmp also) on my 32 bit linux machine. Please test it to ensure it works fine on other platforms too.
>
> Cheers,
> Deepika
> From: deepika dutta <deepikadutta_19@...oo.com>
> To: "john-dev@...ts.openwall.com" <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 11:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [john-dev] mschapv2-bitsliced conversion
>
> Ok I will do that.
>
> Cheers,
> Deepika
> From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 1:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [john-dev] mschapv2-bitsliced conversion
>
> On 14 Feb, 2013, at 19:44 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
> > I have merged your code with the latest mschapv2-naive version (it now has Freeradius support too) and dropped the old version in favor of this bitslice format. I have tested on x86 32/64 SSE and generic, as well as Sparc32 big-endian. And I ran it through out test suite. Everything seems fine. You can see the changes in unstable-jumbo branch (soon to be Jumbo 8) and bleeding-jumbo branch (future) here:
> > https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper.git
> >
> > Note that your code is now named --format=mschapv2-naive and file is MSCHAPv2_bs_fmt_plug.c. The other (default) format now exploits a weakness so it doesn't use DES at all in the inner loop (massive speedup). But that format loads very slow so the BS format is better in some situations. It is also an excellent example for future DES stuff. We should do the same to NETNTLM_old_fmt_plug.c for a starter - it is almost identical to MSCHAPv2.
> >
> > There are some whitespace changes, so diff it with -w to see the changes. Please base any future contributions on latest Git. Thanks!
> >
> > Solar, I committed this to unstable too. We can revert it if problems surface. Old code is moved to unused/ and modifed so it will happily co-exist with the two others if moved back for testing.
>
> I just realized the new code does not work for -mmx builds. I do not think many people need such a target but I guess we still have to support it. Deepika, could you try to implement one of the follwing?
>
> a) Implement MMX version of DES_bs_crypt_plain() in x86-mmx.S
>
> or
>
> b) Add some #ifdef-ninja so MSCHAPv2 use generic code for MMX builds - without affecting DES and LM formats.
>
> Please base this on the unstable-jumbo branch of Github as above.
>
> magnum
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <john-unstable-jumbo-MMX-BS-1.diff>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
