[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8024aef8e81e94228bfa9f69fadd6115@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:49:32 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: mschapv2-bitsliced conversion
Oh, I was so close in my previous mail. This works on OSX:
diff --git a/src/x86-64.S b/src/x86-64.S
index 5026c6c..e0b2c08 100644
--- a/src/x86-64.S
+++ b/src/x86-64.S
@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
#define DES_bs_crypt _DES_bs_crypt
#define DES_bs_crypt_25 _DES_bs_crypt_25
#define DES_bs_crypt_LM _DES_bs_crypt_LM
-#define P _P
#define DES_bs_crypt_plain _DES_bs_crypt_plain
#endif
@@ -99,7 +98,11 @@ DO_SPACE(nptr(48))
#define E(i) DES_bs_all_E+nptr(i)(%rip)
#define B(i) DES_bs_all_B+nvec(i)(%rip)
#define tmp_at(i) DES_bs_all_tmp+nvec(i)(%rip)
-#define P(i) P+nvec(i)
+#ifdef UNDERSCORES
+#define P(i) _P+nvec(i)(%rip)
+#else
+#define P(i) P+nvec(i)(%rip)
+#endif
#define pnot tmp_at(0)
This is relative to john-1.7.9-jumbo-5-MSCHAPV2-BS-4.diff.
Benchmarking: MSCHAPv2 C/R MD4 DES [DES_BS_MSCHAPv2]... DONE
Many salts: 83918K c/s real, 83918K c/s virtual
Only one salt: 7691K c/s real, 7691K c/s virtual
magnum
On 14 Feb, 2013, at 9:40 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
> I think you should revert this latest patch, it was probably less bad before. For OSX 64-bit you need to use relative addressing. If I do this:
>
> 1. revert this latest patch
> 2. drop the _P define in line 45 (for now)
> 3. change to relative addressing like this:
>
> -#define P(i) P+nvec(i)
> +#define P(i) P+nvec(i)(%rip)
>
> ...now the code assembles on OSX without a warning. However it fails self-test because the addressing is not quite right now I guess. I do not really know assembler but I think that is closer to a solution.
>
> magnum
>
>
> On 14 Feb, 2013, at 9:10 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This did not help the OSX assembler:
>>
>> x86-64.S:99:0: warning: "P" redefined [enabled by default]
>> x86-64.S:45:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
>> x86-64.S:67:Unknown pseudo-op: .extern
>> x86-64.S:67:Rest of line ignored. 1st junk character valued 95 (_).
>> x86-64.S:1368:32-bit absolute addressing is not supported for x86-64
>> x86-64.S:1368:cannot do signed 4 byte relocation
>> x86-64.S:1370:32-bit absolute addressing is not supported for x86-64
>> x86-64.S:1370:cannot do signed 4 byte relocation
>>
>> This uses the same arch.h as Linux, but -DUNDERSCORES, -DBSD and -DALIGN_LOG.
>>
>> magnum
>>
>>
>> On 14 Feb, 2013, at 8:50 , deepika dutta <deepikadutta_19@...oo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am attaching a new patch handling the problem of multiple definition of P. I hope it works on all platforms.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Deepika
>>> From: deepika dutta <deepikadutta_19@...oo.com>
>>> To: "john-dev@...ts.openwall.com" <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 1:11 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [john-dev] mschapv2-bitsliced conversion
>>>
>>> I think I can correct the warning of multiple definition of P. Though this warning didn't occur in linux, I feel that P has been defined in multiple locations and need to be externed in the assembly file. I will look into this and give a new patch for your testing. I don't know why the other issues are coming, maybe someone can resolve them.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Deepika
>>> From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
>>> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:37 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [john-dev] mschapv2-bitsliced conversion
>>>
>>> Deepika's work can be found in branch "mschapv2-bs" on GitHub, with patch history preserved. It is still based on 1.7.9-jumbo-5. It seems to work just fine on Linux (64-bit works fine on Bull, 32-bit cross compile builds fine too but we have no 32-bit OpenSSL to link against).
>>>
>>> On 64-bit OSX I get this though:
>>>
>>> x86-64.S:102:0: warning: "P" redefined [enabled by default]
>>> x86-64.S:45:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
>>> x86-64.S:1371:32-bit absolute addressing is not supported for x86-64
>>> x86-64.S:1371:cannot do signed 4 byte relocation
>>> x86-64.S:1373:32-bit absolute addressing is not supported for x86-64
>>> x86-64.S:1373:cannot do signed 4 byte relocation
>>> x86-64.S:1375:32-bit absolute addressing is not supported for x86-64
>>> x86-64.S:1375:cannot do signed 4 byte relocation
>>> x86-64.S:1377:32-bit absolute addressing is not supported for x86-64
>>> x86-64.S:1377:cannot do signed 4 byte relocation
>>> x86-64.S:1379:32-bit absolute addressing is not supported for x86-64
>>> x86-64.S:1379:cannot do signed 4 byte relocation
>>> ...
>>> make[1]: *** [x86-64.o] Error 1
>>> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>> make: *** [macosx-x86-64] Error 2
>>>
>>> And on 32-bit:
>>>
>>> x86-sse.S:118:1: warning: "P" redefined
>>> x86-sse.S:61:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
>>> Undefined symbols for architecture i386:
>>> "P", referenced from:
>>> _DES_bs_crypt_plain in x86-sse.o
>>> ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture i386
>>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>>> make[1]: *** [../run/john] Error 1
>>> make: *** [macosx-x86-sse2] Error 2
>>>
>>>
>>> These are hopefully trivial problems. If we get them solved, I'll see if I can add this as a separate format for a starter, eg. "mschapv2-bs" and merge it to current bleeding tree.
>>>
>>> magnum
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7 Feb, 2013, at 20:50 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thanks, I'll have a look at your patch within a week.
>>> >
>>> > magnum
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 7 Feb, 2013, at 20:21 , deepika dutta <deepikadutta_19@...oo.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi, I am attaching a new patch which is tested to work on both 32 and 64 bit SSE2 linux OS. I have modified both x86-sse.S and x86-64.S.
>>> >> I cannot say for sure that this will not break the build on other targets. I think someone should test this since I do not have those target machines. I will try to rectify any problems which arise due to this.
>>> >>
>>> >> Regarding working on converting other formats, though I don't think it will be too difficult but I will inform you whenever I get ample time to devote on it :)
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Deepika
>>> >> From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
>>> >> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
>>> >> Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 2:43 PM
>>> >> Subject: Re: [john-dev] mschapv2-bitsliced conversion- openmp support
>>> >>
>>> >> On 7 Feb, 2013, at 8:35 , Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> On 02/07/2013 04:47 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 07:12:34AM -0800, deepika dutta wrote:
>>> >>>>> Actually, I worked on coverting the DES_bs_crypt_plain(), which I had added to do single DES encryption, into SSE implementation. I have added this function into the x86-sse.S file. Since the code in this file was in assembly language, I tried some copy-pasting from previous code and added some assembly code myself to get the single DES encryption working. I compiled this program using linux-x86-64 option, everything is working fine and the latest banchmarks for bitsliced implementation are given below. You can test for yourself. The patch is attached.
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm confused - isn't x86-sse.S only used for 32 bit SSE builds? For 64-bit it should be x86-64.S. Or did you do both? That would be awesome.
>>> >>
>>> >>>> This is cool, but (un)fortunately we've just revised the MSCHAPv2 format
>>> >>>> such that it does not depend on speed of DES encryption anymore - see
>>> >>>> the "NetNTLMv1 and MSCHAPv2" thread in here. So I'm afraid there's no
>>> >>>> point in introducing your changes to that format now (nor would they
>>> >>>> apply to the revised code).
>>> >>>
>>> >>> But the changes should apply to the new mschapv2-naive format which
>>> >>> basically is the renamed old mschapv2 format, intended for shorter
>>> >>> cracking runs, because it loads hashes faster than the new mschapv2.
>>> >>
>>> >> True, although it wouldn't be much benefit other than as a nice example of code - you'll only use the old naïve version for very short runs where the speed doesn't matter anyway.
>>> >>
>>> >> Anyway, the thing that has stopped me from pulling the MSCHAPv2 BS patches into Jumbo is the fact they (so far) b0rked builds other than generic (and now linux-x86-64?). I haven't looked at this latest patch yet but I assume it still breaks some builds. There is no need to implement BS for every single target, but the changes need to be #ifdef'ed so that all builds pick code that works for it. Given that, I'll include it right away (even for mschapv2-naive).
>>> >>
>>> >> Also, new patches should ideally be rebased upon the bleeding-jumbo branch on GitHub: https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/tree/bleeding-jumbo
>>> >>
>>> >> magnum
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> <john-1.7.9-jumbo-5-MSCHAPV2-BS-4.diff>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <john-1.7.9-jumbo-5-MSCHAPV2-BS-5.diff>
>>
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
