[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e2f37ee667f11822f83f7b75530bf44@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:14:00 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: jtrts.pl: 3 tests failed on linux-x86-native and linux-x86-clang
On 14 Feb, 2013, at 0:08 , Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> wrote:
> On 02/14/2013 12:04 AM, magnum wrote:
>> On 13 Feb, 2013, at 23:50 , Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> wrote:
>>> These tests fail:
>>>
>>> form=mschapv2-utf8 guesses: 1442 time: 0:00:01:04 :
>>> Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!]
>>> .pot CHK:mschapv2-utf8 guesses: 1442 time: 0:00:01:16 [PASSED]
>>>
>>> form=netntlm-utf8 guesses: 1442 time: 0:00:01:03 :
>>> Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!]
>>> .pot CHK:netntlm-utf8 guesses: 1442 time: 0:00:01:04 [PASSED]
>>>
>>> form=netntlm(l0phtcrack)-utf8 guesses: 1442 time: 0:00:01:03 :
>>> Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!]
>>> .pot CHK:netntlm(l0phtcrack)-utf8 guesses: 1442 time: 0:00:00:59 [PASSED]
>>>
>>> With linux-x86-clang, I just repeated the utf8 tests.
>>> The same 3 tests fail.
>>
>> This is merely an effect of the Test Suite not being aware of the decrease in maximum lengths, that comes from recent SSE2 support in mschapv2 and ntlmv1.
>>
>> So the fix will be in TS - I will do that now. Thanks!
>
> A generic build on 32bit linux passes these tests, so 1500 should be
> kept for those formats that don't use SSE2 here.
Yes, we do such things for other formats already. The TS is not really aware of the build but it will accept either 1442 or 1500 as valid.
Committed now.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
