Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130207041003.GA31043@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:10:03 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: NTLMv1 and MSCHAPv2

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:13:06PM +0100, magnum wrote:
> On 6 Feb, 2013, at 15:03 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> > Great.  Now should we adjust the format_name or algorithm_name for the
> > naive formats to indicate that they're naive (and different from the
> > newly sped up ones)?  I think we should.  Any specific suggestions?
> 
> I think we should use algorithm_name, as in [32/32 naive].

Sounds good.

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.