Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a3ac506b12f67b0669ebca1418460d7@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:40:37 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Proposed optimizations to pwsafe

On 3 Feb, 2013, at 23:06 , Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> wrote:

> On 02/03/2013 07:54 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
>> We got useful test results from atom (thanks again!):
>> 
>> http://pastebin.com/xCaeqBKY
> 
> Does anybody on this list know whether this
> 
> | Input.Mode.....: Mask (?a?a?a?a?a?a)
> 
> means that candidates matching this mask are generated on the GPU
> instead of the CPU?

At this speed, it does not matter much. In general I think the short answer is yes for oclHashcat. I don't really know the long answer, but I reckon in general just a sufficient number of characters are produced on GPU.

magnum

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.