[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86c45c0f99e28be6f5b2c580aa214e60@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:42:57 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Speeding up WPAPSK, by leveraging salt shortcomings
On 1 Feb, 2013, at 14:18 , jfoug <jfoug@....net> wrote:
> Here is the patch. I have kept my debugging code in it (for now). The
> debugging is mostly the extra data in the structure, and using an array, vs
> a memory allocated array. But the debug code is wrapped with a #define, so
> unless that is defined, the extra crap will not be there.
I wrapped the debug stuff in #ifdef WPAPSK_DEBUG and made the helpers static (otherwise they clashed when included from GPU formats too).
Patch is applied. It works like a champ! This is Good Stuff. Nice and clean, I see no reason not to introduce such a method pointer to the struct. But until then, we have it for wpapsk formats.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
