Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bcb6e7db8b85c725af8ea33ed195a3fa@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:43:17 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: mscash2 speed (was: Proposed optimizations to pwsafe)

On 27 Jan, 2013, at 0:25 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:58:29PM +0100, magnum wrote:
> What I saw happen when optimizing Sayantan's older mscash2-opencl code -

BTW if I am not mistaken our mscash2 is currently a whopping 33% faster than OclHashcat on 7970. That is IRL, not benchmark. Is that old news? It sounds too good to be true. For Hashcat, I get ~75K c/s. On 7970 I get over 100K. I really regard Hashcat as the very benchmark to strive for, I did not think we could beat it that good. Maybe that is why Atom does not list DCC2 benchmarks...

magnum

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.